ReviewReviewReviewReviewSpider-Man 3May 1, '07 11:29 AM
for everyone
Category:Movies
Genre: Action & Adventure
Spectacular, But Not Perfect

10:50am on May 1 Labor Day here in the Philippines, one of the first showings of Spider-Man 3 finally came. It was a long wait since part two, and the expectations for this one was high due to it being the trilogy wrap up episode where every story arc is tied up. Add to that the much awaited debut of fan-favorite villain Venom and the hype for this movie was at fever pitch.

Could part 3 possibly live up to the acclaim of the first two films? For me, a die-hard Spidey fan, the answer is yes and no. Since i like saving the good for last, let's start out with what didn't work:

the wRong
The dance number. For those who haven't seen, I am not kidding. It seemed a bit campy and indulgent of director Sam Raimi to execute this scene that way. Another thing that I was worried about was the abundance of characters in this movie. While I enjoyed seeing Gwen Stacy and Eddie Brock for the first time, I honestly could have waited for them until another movie and just focus on Green Goblin 2 and the Sandman, BUT teasing a Venom appearance for a full-blown story in 'hopefully' a part four. In fact, in the original script, Raimi didn't have Venom at all because he loved classic villains like Sandman more than fan-favorites. Marvel Films producer Avi Arad told Raimi to "listen to the fans" and give them the much beloved Venom on screen... but in this case, I'd have to agree with Raimi. While I love the character myself, and his 20 minutes of screen time was some awesome CGI eye candy, I still stand by my opinion that they could have saved him and not be 'rushed' into the franchise just to sell more merchandise.

It was a Herculean task to fit all these new characters, three villains, and the black costume into one movie, and while it succeeded to a certain degree, it made each element in the movie less special than what it should be. Little things that peeved me were the origin of the Symbiote (where did it come from? I read somewhere that it came from a space mission of John Jameson, but this wasn't explained in the movie) and the sand experiment. I guess I was used to well-done origins in the first two movies, that this one felt a little more 'they get powers cause it's convenient'. The Venom origin though is straight from the comics, so at least that was ok. Oh, and one last thing to put in this section was the HORRIBLE British news reporter in the end... just bad.

the Right:
Ok, now that I got all that criticism out, it's time to totally mark out for Spidey. As always, the cast was awesome. From the supporting roles of Aunt May and J.J. Jameson, newcomers Eddie Brock (Topher Grace), Sandman (Thomas Hayden Church), Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard), and the core of Peter/Spidey (Maguire), MJ (Dunst), and Harry (Franco) - the cast delivered big time in this movie. Harry in particular is the standout in my opinion, as he struggles the line between friend and villain. Maguire is great as always, as he runs the gamut from geek, to dickhead, to best friend, lover, and of course, hero. Although his dark 'emo' look when influenced by the black costume is kinda funny. Another thing that goes into this section are the effects. This is easily the most spectacular Spidey yet - the scene where Sandman arises and virtually every scene with Venom are just awesome and I'll definitely watch over and over again on DVD. Another thing I liked was the motives of the villains. No one is trying to take over the world here - Goblin2 and Venom want to destroy Parker for personal grudges, and Sandman just wants to rob banks to save what's most important to him, no cockimaney plot to make land out of alien rocks and make profits from real estate (Luthor from Superman Returns). Speaking of villains, while I'm sort of iffy about Venom appearing here, there's no doubt that I enjoyed what was there. Grace did a great job in the role, and I think was more effective and creepier when he reveals his face in the Venom suit.

Another thing I loved was the final battle, which was truly epic and really tied up a lot of things for both Parker and Spider-Man. Oh, and someone that deserves to be in this section is Bruce Campbell who steals a scene for the third film in a row as the arrogant 'French' restaurant clerk.

The veRdict:
Overall, it was a satisfying conclusion to the Spider-Man trilogy. It saddens me that it may be the last one with Raimi, Dunst, and Maguire involved. Their contracts are only for a 3 picture deal, and Maguire was stated that he'd like to move on from the franchise unless there's something really interesting to keep him on board. The movie delivers in the effects department and in tying up loose threads, while comes up short in letting the numerous amount of new characters develop and shine. To me, Spider-Man 2 is the best in the series because of the fewer characters and cohesive script. Plus, nothing tops MJ seeing Spidey unmasked for the first time as the greatest Spider-Man movie moment to me. Spider-Man 3 is definitely a great time, whether you're a casual fan or hardcore geek, there's plenty to love about part 3. Here's hoping to more Spidey flicks in the future!


13 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
fluxxethursdays wrote on May 1, '07
I loved it! I absolutely loved it! But yes to that horrible dancing scene with Peter. And WTF was up with the symbiote crash-landing in the same park where Peter and Mj were? How contrived was that? And hell yes, that Brit reporter was awful, simply AWFUL.

But I loved Harry, MJ and Peter's new directions here. They were phenomental! Phenomenal! They made J.J. Jameson hilarious again! (he was funny in Part 1, dry in part 2, and back in hilarious fighting form in part 3!) Gwen Stacy stole my heart; perfect casting! Grace kicked ass. I'm actually glad they put Venom here; visually stunning as he is, he's one-dimensional and not very interesting as a central villain. Over-all, great film!
ryderaquino wrote on May 1, '07
WTF was up with the symbiote crash-landing in the same park where Peter and Mj were? How contrived was that?
exactly, i wished they explained that more, even just a news report of jameson landing from a space mission would've been enough. also, marko running into the most poorly guarded science experiment of ALL TIME at the exact right time dulls in comparison to say, doc ock's origin. it's not perfect, but i guess i'm just hard on Spidey 3 cuz' of the greatness of the first two.
ryderaquino wrote on May 1, '07
But I loved Harry, MJ and Peter's new directions here. They were phenomental!
agreed! after 3 movies, the cast really gels well and seem effortless in their roles. i guess you're right about Venom being visually stunning yet one-dimensional. i just feel he was 'tacked' on as a final villain and stole some of Sandman's thunder. but i guess they had to culminate the black costume arc with brock in the end though.
fluxxethursdays wrote on May 2, '07
i just feel he was 'tacked' on as a final villain and stole some of Sandman's thunder. but i guess they had to culminate the black costume arc with brock in the end though.
I think Brock wouldn't have been good as a main villain in one movie, it would get tiring after awhile. Sandman showed the other side of the criminal mind, while Venom was just as hollow an archetype as there's ever been. Don't get me wrong, I was a fan of Venom in the comics, but then I stopped following his character because he became a bit like Spawn towards the end: visually stunning, but flat and under-developed. But kudos goes to Raimi for what he did with Venom: what he did to Peter will never be forgotten. He took away something Peter will never get back. (Let's not spoil that, hehehe.)
skyewhit wrote on May 2, '07
Whooo hooo, BRuce Campbell and his French ARMY OF DARKNESS! :p

ANd yes, that reporter was Overkill, seriously. And wasn't the camera a tad too shaky this time around, when Sandman first comes out to rob armoured vehicles?

Too many characters...that's IT! I was trying to figure out what was a bit off with the 3rd movie.

The second one will always be my favorite, too. Sniff.
fudgecookie18 wrote on May 2, '07
thanks for the review! I have yet to watch the film. Insightful, very insightful. :D
ryderaquino wrote on May 2, '07
Too many characters...that's IT! I was trying to figure out what was a bit off with the 3rd movie.

The second one will always be my favorite, too. Sniff.
exactly! i mean, everyone new was great but i felt didn't get a chance to shine. sandman got just two scenes for character development that bookended the film, while the rest of the time he's imhotep from the mummy (which looked great though, to be fair). and gwen stacy's dad was a waste of a great actor in James Cromwell, i don't even think he had any scene with his daughter! there's just so much going on, it really lacked the focus and polish of Spider-Man 2. glad you agree that that was the best in the series. the first had a great origin story and energy, except the goblin looked goofy. the 2nd was well-balanced with story and action. this one was kinda sloppy building to the grand finale, which redeemed the movie a great deal. i WANT to love spidey 3, but comparison is a bitch, and spidey 2 owns all comic movies IMO!
ryderaquino wrote on May 2, '07, edited on May 2, '07
thanks for the review! I have yet to watch the film. Insightful, very insightful. :D
your welcome camille, glad you liked it! while it's not perfect, the movie is still a great ride. don't pass it up in the theaters as it is a feast for the eyes, has some heartfelt moments and a sprinkle of (campy) humor. hope i didn't spoil too much in my review! i tried to keep it as spoiler-free as i could and focus more on the general rights & wrongs of the movie and scenes that don't spoil the main story=)
rockart wrote on May 3, '07
As much as i love the spiderman comics and the old spiderman and friends cartoons... Kirsten Dunst pretty much ruined the whole 3 movies for me... tsk tsk
ryderaquino wrote on May 3, '07, edited on May 3, '07
rockart said
As much as i love the spiderman comics and the old spiderman and friends cartoons... Kirsten Dunst pretty much ruined the whole 3 movies for me... tsk tsk
wow, not a dunst fan huh? i think she did well, although it's kinda funny that bryce dallas howard is a natural red-head but blond as gwen stacy, while kirsten dunst is a natural blond but red-headed as MJ. other than that, there's so much to like about the movies like tobey, james franco, j.k simmons, the stellar cast of villains dafoe, molina, grace and church in spidey 3 (those last two are very evil last names noh? hehe), and ofcourse, the great effects and story! i hope one bad apple didn't ruin the whole barrel in the case of the spidey flicks. haha we're all entitled to our opinions though.

since you seem to like your leading ladies, who do you think would make a good 'Death' from the Gaiman books if ever there'd be a Sandman (the master of dreams one) movie?=)
ryderaquino wrote on May 20, '07
i just watched it again today, 2 weeks after its release because my family watched shrek3 which i have already seen the night before. on 2nd viewing, i was surprised to enjoy the movie more than my first time! for some reason, i didn't mind all the gripes i had before and just enjoyed the acting and the cgi goodness. i still think spidey 2 is the better film though.
mcc4374 wrote on Oct 5, '07
bring on Spiderman 4!
ryderaquino wrote on Oct 5, '07
mcc4374 said
bring on Spiderman 4!
hell yeah! i wonder if raimi, maguire, and dunst will be back though. i know maguire will be busy with robotech in the future, so if they decide to re-cast spidey, i hope they get Milo Ventemiglia from Heroes!

Add a Comment
How would you rate this movie? (optional)
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help