ReviewReviewReviewReviewHarry Potter and the Order of the PhoenixJul 15, '07 9:00 AM
for everyone
Category:Movies
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy
Am I the only person who liked this flick? Everyone is saying it's 'boring' and 'slow' and nothing significant happened... but I had a good time watching the wonderful effects, the spirited performances, and steady pacing. True it doesn't have the non-stop action of Die Hard, or the campy fun of Transformers... but that's exactly what I like about it. It's a slow burn of a flick that really kicks into gear in the last act, and I think that's totally fine. As a backgrounder, I thought the first two Columbus-helmed films were solid, but lacked flow and visual flare. Cuaron turned it all around with the third flick, Azkaban, and i thought Newell's Goblet was a solid flick and a step in the right direction. Now, Phoenix has the tough job of being the aftermath of the fourth and the start of the concluding trilogy, and I think director David Yates did a good job of handling this transition. The main cast is coming of age, the professors are excellent in their small roles, and the villains are absolutely terrific in their performances. And thus, the nitty-gritty of what I think worked, and didn't work in this latest Potter flick. SPOILERS abound, so be warned.

the wRong:
Decreased Roles:I really had to find something wrong with this flick. If ever, it''s the decreased role of some of my favorite characters from the past flicks. Mad Eye Moody, Hagrid, Lupin, Snape, etc. were all in the movie, but had barely a few lines to show for it. What little time they were there was great though. I especially wanted more of Alan Rickman's spot-on Snape character, especially since a lot of his past was revealed.
Cho Chang: Ok, this doesn't really have to do with her performance, but really her character in the story. What a traitorous beeotch. (Gayette has just informed me she was forced to drink a friggin' truth serum!)
The Score: The new score by Nicholas Hooper is fine and functional, but I guess I just miss the distinctiveness and grandeur of John Williams. A score is supposed to be subdued yet memorable - a tough balance, and since i can't say much wrong about this movie, I'll put this in the wRong section but it's really more in 'purgatory'.

the Right
The Cast: Harry Potter simply has one of the best casts around. The main trio has really great chemistry as always, while supporting roles are also memorable. It doesn't matter how famous the actors are - they just play their roles so well they become their characters... and really, I think that's all that matters. Here, I'd like to point out who were the exceptional ones:
Sirius Black: Do I really have to point out what a great actor Gary Oldman is? His Black is the caring father and cool uncle all roled into one. That made his untimely demise all the more moving... and Radcliffe's silent screaming showed beautifully the pain he was feeling.
Dolores Umbridge: Yeah I know Staunton's role was a big one and what some consider 'filler' for the main plot of the movie... but c'mon, she was deliciously evil here and played her role to a T. From the way she punishes students, the iron fist rule she dictates by, and freakishly perky-pink personality - she's definitely my favorite new character in the series.
Harry Potter: Radcliffe has come a long way in this series. This is easily his best performance as 'the boy that lived' in the whole series. His inner struggles, dealing with new emotions of affection, having to be the reluctant leader of the rebellious students... Radcliffe did an excellent job and proves why he was chosen to be the face of the most popular literary character today.
Luna Lovegood: Evanna Lynch plays this character so mysteriously charming that I wanted her for Harry more than that traitor Cho. She relates to Harry's tragic side more than anyone, but is also a compassionate friend and ally.
The Effects: Need I say more? It's not as amazing as it probably once was, but I loved how they were visually executed in this one, especially the magic spells, Hagrid's giant brother, the spectacular fight between Dumbledore and Voldemort, and...
The Order Vs Death Eaters Battle: Just when hope was lost in the end and the kids were sure to be doomed... Sirius Black comes right on time and punches Lucious Malfoy old-school style. The cavalry comes, Moody, Lupin and the rest of the order face off against Belaxtrix and the Death Eaters... the battle that commenced exceeded my expectations of what a wizard battle should look like. Utterly cool and breathtaking.
Tonks: Natalia Tena is the most gorgeous witch ever. She was barely in the movie, but when she was there with the Order it was great. Oh, and you can't go wrong with a name like 'Nymphadora'.

the veRdict:
All in all, I'm still torn where to place Potter 5 in the series in terms of quality... I'd say it ties with Goblet, just under Azkaban, and miles better than the first two. I love how this one is grounded in the real world more, showing scenes in modern London. I love the wonderful cast and how great they play their roles, whether big or small. I love the amazing effects. I love the new characters Umbridge and Luna. It may not have the visual panache of Azkaban, or the big story of Goblet, but what was there I enjoyed a lot. It was a 'transitional' Potter that's slow because it sets up the impending war in future movies, but I found nothing wrong with that and the great performances made these seemingly 'slow' scenes still enjoyable. It's not for everyone, and I can't really imagine kids warming up to it... This movie was actually more mature than Transformers! But if your looking for a quality flick this summer, let Order of the Phoenix cast its spell on you.

On a side note, David Yates is set to direct Half-Blood Prince as well, so I'm looking forward to another quality Potter sequel in the near future.


102 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
justcallmeligaya wrote on Jul 15, '07
parang ayaw ko ng panoorin :(
18thspy wrote on Jul 15, '07
Cho Chang.. bee-otch ^__^
myco wrote on Jul 15, '07
much better that the Goblet of Fire movie.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
really? why? i gave it a positive review! hahaha. did i spoil it? i had a spoiler warning before i got to stuff that might give away the movie...
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
damn straight!
j4ever wrote on Jul 15, '07
masyado akong nagexpect sa movie. Di ako nasatisfy. Napainom tuloy ako pagkatapos kong manood.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
yeah, it definitely wasn't for everyone... what exactly were u expecting? is it book based? or more action or something? ok lang yan, at least masaya ang pag-inom! hahaha
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
oh yeah, i thought they were pretty even... Goblet had the more epic story though so I'd give a slight edge to that one... Phoenix is a very, very solid flick though XD
darthstalker wrote on Jul 15, '07
i don't feel like writing something about this one because (is it just me?) nobody really gets it why azkaban (is still the best, imho) characters were great, had a sense of foreboding and not overly played.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07, edited on Jul 15, '07
hahaha you're not alone raph...XD

aba! just as i claim this your gal pal seconds your notion! hmmmm... XD
rossinthecity wrote on Jul 15, '07
this imo is the best movie so far. azkaban was the most disappointing. cuaron sucks ass
myco wrote on Jul 15, '07
if you've read the book(s). all movies are a disappointment.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
glad you liked the flick too. azkaban and cuaron suck?! suntukan tayo! hahaha joke! as i always believe, 'to each, his/her own'. what do u think of his other works, great expectations & y tu mama tambien? i've yet to see pan's labyrinth, but i think he was only a producer there and the movie was really guillermo del toro's baby...
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07, edited on Jul 15, '07
i've only read the first book, sorcerer's stone and liked it better than the film version. everything else i only have the films to judge. all i know about 'phoenix' is that it's almost 900 pages or something, hahaha XD
rossinthecity wrote on Jul 15, '07
869 pages to be exact.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
have you read the book? they say a lot of fat got trimmed... i heard somewhere of prof. Trelawny's connection to something, but i don't know what....
rossinthecity wrote on Jul 15, '07
i've read all the books. every book-to-film adaptation has been trimmed considerably. take lotr for instance. nawala si tom bombadil. but that's another story. i'll always be a bigger fan of the books than the films.
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
true true... so rare for a film to be better than its source... i don't recall any in fact! i'm not a book reader myself, and the only other book i remember reading that was adapted (other than sorcerer's) is da vinci code, and that movie sucked ass. oh, i have a friend who liked the 'devil wears prada' movie more than the book though...

i'm curious to read 300 and sin city (although they are comics and not books per se) cuz' their film adaptations look faithful...
j4ever wrote on Jul 15, '07
yeah, it definitely wasn't for everyone... what exactly were u expecting? is it book based? or more action or something? ok lang yan, at least masaya ang pag-inom! hahaha
well, di ko pa nababsa yung book. Mostly sa trailer ako nagbase. Siguro sa action pero di rin. Di ko mapinpoint, basta parang nakulangan ako. hahahaha, pero siguro dahil rin sa Transformers high kaya ganito ang feeling.
j4ever wrote on Jul 15, '07
true true... so rare for a film to be better than its source... i don't recall any in fact! i'm not a book reader myself, and the only other book i remember reading that was adapted (other than sorcerer's) is da vinci code, and that movie sucked ass. oh, i have a friend who liked the 'devil wears prada' movie more than the book though...

i'm curious to read 300 and sin city (although they are comics and not books per se) cuz' their film adaptations look faithful...
Yung 300 ang tinanggal lang yung male nudity tapos dinagdag nila ang ilang scenes ni Gorgo.
rossinthecity wrote on Jul 15, '07
ok yung 300. another book-to-film adaptation to watch out for is Stardust by Neil Gaiman.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
oh yeah i've heard of that one! i'm actually clueless about it... just that a lot of people think claire danes has no business playing the part she's playing, hahaha
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
omit male nudity, add hot chick. works for me!
darthstalker wrote on Jul 15, '07, edited on Jul 15, '07
hahahah could be that i like character studies in a movie, take morvern callar for instance, it's a great sleeper film nobody understood. it's nice to know you despise cardboard cutout characters in movies, gary oldman rules them all. michael gambon was the "miscast of azkaban," and that turned-off more people than i would expect. we were introduced to a visual gothic grandeur of hogwarts and paved the way to a darker potter films to follow. it was the turning point in the series.

maybe people don''t want a dark potter, i just can't imagine hogwarts to be filled with shiny happy people. hey, look how messed up harry's life was, can you imagine him growing up to be a brooding, secretly vengeful, calculating, rebellious teen? i can. he should be bruce wayne with a wand not the dorky peter parker with a squeaky voice. lollers. yeah, if i learned someone murdered my folks, i'd be effed-up in my noodle six ways to sunday too.

azkaban set the standards or for a more added drama, opened the portals for the dark days to come.
sighs wrote on Jul 15, '07
radcliffe finally learned to act in this one. watson and leung irritated the hell out of me. watson: OA. leung: states her lines in the tone of a question. i loved the actresses who played dolores and bellatrix due to the fact that i dont know which to hate more. i truly enjoyed the movie. everything that i thought was good in the book was implied at least subtly. like ginny's power, tonks' clumsiness, etc. i dont understand why people must always complain about the movies never being as good as the book. they're two different things. it's a matter of preference. i mean, ive always liked the books better than the movies for the last 4 but this time, i actually think i like them equally. granted, the 5th book is my least favorite in the series. hehe.
falinie wrote on Jul 15, '07
nung pinanood ko ito, parang ang bilis ng kuwento, sabagay wala naman talagang masyadong nangyari sa book 5... ang mahalaga dun yung napatunayan na buhay si Voldemort. Nag-expect rin ako na sana ipalabas yung for the first time nagkaroon ng insecurity si Harry kay Ron dahil naging prefect si Ron at hindi siya, which is expected ng lahat na siya ang pipiliin... para sa akin kasi that makes Harry more HUMAN na may feelings, na hindi siya PERFECT CHARACTER, all-goody-things lagi ang iniisip. pero ok naman sa akin yung performance ni Daniel, nakakatuwang isipin na habang tumatagal lalo siyang nag-iimprove, pati rin kina Rupert at Emma. Siguro kaya nasabi rin ng iba na "boring" ang movie kasi wala yung Quidditch match! yun kasi ang tatak niya eh! Bilib din ako sa special effects lalo yung sa fighting scene nina Dumbledore at Voldemort... perfect choice talaga si Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort, naaaliw ako sa mga gestures nya, napaka-elegant kumilos pero ramdam mo yung dominance at evilness nya... yun lang.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
oh haven't heard of that morvern callar pic, i'll check it out if you deem it so highly raph. i thought gambon was ok in these pics, but there was truly something magical about harris when he played the role back then. as for a dark potter, i think rowling doesn't wanna turn him into batman cuz' it's still a kids story, albeit now a more mature one as the books continue. i think the main difference between potter and wayne is that potter was still an infant when his parents died, while wayne was already a kid and actually remembers their brutal death.

wait nalilito ako, so u like azkaban? hahah sorry magulo ka kasi eh! hahahaha
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07, edited on Jul 15, '07
glad you agree about radcliffe! he really had to bust out the chops in this one... i especially love his scene with snape... where before potter would cower at his presence, now he's totally confident with him and even gave him an unpleasant trip down memory lane! (potter senior sure was a mean old coot back in the day). watson didn't grow much in her role, but i think that's more of her character in the story... she shined in 'azkaban' cuz' the story called for a lot from her... as for leung's cho... yeah her acting didn't set the world on fire, but her story driven act of treason made me hate her guts! hahaha... as for dolores and bellatrix... dolores hands down! sayang si bellatrix, if her character was built up more, it would've made sirius' 'death' more significant, not just out of blue...

as for your opinion about potter 5 movie being equal to the book, i guess i'll just take your word for it! haha, haven't read a potter book since the first one... agree though that you can't fit all that 869 pages of content in a 2 hr flick... i guess it's just some people love those scenes or characters in the book so much when it's not in the movie, the movie automatically sucks, w/c isn't fair imo...
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
actually, voldemort's return was the main story! but the movie focused on umbridge almost entirely, but i thought that was fine cuz' she was so good in the role. ron became a PREFECT? wow, i wonder why they omitted that.... oh yeah, there was no quidditch for the first time i think! i didn't even notice when i was watching... as for fiennes, he's also a great actor, but i think his best performance as voldemort is yet to come... he's been very teaser-ish in his appearances, so i expect him to be more of a presence in future films!
gayette wrote on Jul 15, '07
Ryder... you did know that CHo Chang was made to drink a truth syrum right? So she couldn't help but betray the order... but it wasn't her choice. You can check again... Snape mentions it when Umbridge asked for more and he said she used it all up, last on Ms. Chang.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
ooohhh ok that makes tons more sense! crap, i'm too lazy to change my review now! hahaha, i'll just note it there. thanks for the heads up gayette!XD
gayette wrote on Jul 15, '07
Oh dear...none of you are readers! Here goes some info you guys might want to know:
Prof. Trelawney--- she hasn't done anything right/good in her classes in the movie right? Even if it's Divination and yet Dumbledore keeps her on. That's coz she made two right prophecies already. One was the one Harry heard from her in movie three... about Voldemort and Wormtail etc. The other one was the glass ball you all heard in this one. She was the one who prophecied about Harry and Voldermort... the one in THIS movie. That's her voice you heard.
gayette wrote on Jul 15, '07
I hated Hermione's acting... it was awful. Watch again and see what I mean....lackluster would be a perfect word to describe it.
BUT I LOVED Umbridge's acting... she rocked! I wanted to KILL her and scratch her fake-righteousness face. That means she did a great job. :)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
oh yeah now i remember her in the third! wait, what voice though? that i don't remember! hahahaha
lexclusive wrote on Jul 15, '07
gayette said
Ryder... you did know that CHo Chang was made to drink a truth syrum right? So she couldn't help but betray the order... but it wasn't her choice. You can check again... Snape mentions it when Umbridge asked for more and he said she used it all up, last on Ms. Chang.
well if we base the story on the book its not CHO that betrayed the D.A. (Dumbledors Army) its her friend that Umbridge tortured...
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
wow lackluster eh? hahaha... i think it has to do more with her script/role cuz' i thought she did a good job in Azkaban where she seemed even more of the hero than Harry! she did all the planning, going back through time, how to change the past, basically all the 'diskarte'. maybe luna lovegood stole some of her thunder here as she's able to relate to harry more because they're both f'ed up? hahaha i dunno...

totally agree with umbridge... deliciously evil... perky evil! brought back memories of terror professors in college... *shudder*
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
oh really? man i feel like a putz for not reading the books now! you all know all this crap i don't! hahahaha. i guess there were too many characters for them to fit cho's friend noh? hence, she became the scape goat!
acer3ya1 wrote on Jul 15, '07
There's one big flaw in the story. and I'm quite surprised no one realizes it... HARRY had a hair cut, a neat hair cut.
gayette wrote on Jul 15, '07
If we compare the movie with the book-- we'll never end. Seriously. There are too many discrepansies...but at least to give you a little background on the movie... I mentioned Trelawney.

When Harry touches the "orb" or the "prophecy" in the room at the ministry of magic, a voice started talking. Saying something like "...neither can survive whilst the other still lives..." that's Trelawney's voice.
gayette wrote on Jul 15, '07
I say Hermione's acting is lackluster NOT just because of her script/role in this movie but bec she bumbled whatever she had... her first appearance...when she hugged Harry...she was breathing heavily... she looked like she had an asthma attack and her tooth ached or something. Go on..watch again. I've watched the movie twice..and I'm to watch it again soon. (Can't help it... people want me there when they watch so I can explain stuff since I really read and follow HP). Not to brag or what not-- I got disqualified from UP's Harry Potter contests before.. they didn't want to let me compete. Instead, they made me the Quizmaster instead. I formulated the questions and stuff...so... that gives you an idea of how much I follow HP. :P
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
ooohhhh ok THAT voice! great, thanks for being my potter-book guru gayette!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
haha i noticed this too! was it that crucial to the story? hahahaha. at least he didn't get peter parker emo bangs...XD
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 15, '07
tsk tsk, poor ms. watson... maybe a bonus scene where she's punished by umbridge would make you happy? hahaha

wow certified potter-holic ka pala! coolness! when ur friends want you to watch with them cuz of your harry geekiness, they should pay for your ticket!

quizmaster eh? sige nga.... what's harry's mother's maiden name? hahahaha
darthstalker wrote on Jul 16, '07
ReviewReviewReview
oh haven't heard of that morvern callar pic, i'll check it out if you deem it so highly raph. i thought gambon was ok in these pics, but there was truly something magical about harris when he played the role back then. as for a dark potter, i think rowling doesn't wanna turn him into batman cuz' it's still a kids story, albeit now a more mature one as the books continue. i think the main difference between potter and wayne is that potter was still an infant when his parents died, while wayne was already a kid and actually remembers their brutal death.

wait nalilito ako, so u like azkaban? hahah sorry magulo ka kasi eh! hahahaha
a coffin with a beard would be a greater actor than gambon. it's just that we see him on british telly all the time that i think it's lame casting. potter was an infant growing up with that insane family, it must be a good breeding ground why he didn't turn so fucked up. lol.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
found another thing i like about the movie... tonks! i put it in the right section... she's gorgeous...XD
genesisgreyz wrote on Jul 16, '07
the veRdict:
All in all, I'm still torn where to place Potter 5 in the series in terms of quality... I'd say it ties with Goblet, just under Azkaban, and miles better than the first two. I
hmmm, being in a zero-cinema country … I still haven’t seen the movie.. but I have read the book for like so many times… I liked the book so much because it’s got so much action in it...(compared to 1-4) and the battle scenes were superb! The readers would totally feel it.

Perhaps the reason why others find it slow and boring is because they weren’t such an HP fan…it’s totally different when uv actually read it page by page cuz u would really compare (and u wud actually spot the difference)…like in my case, everyone I know went gaga over the LOTR trilogy, but I was like “hmm.. it’s so boring!” hehe…not because I am slow… but because I wasn’t able to read the book tlg.. siguro that’s mainly the reason why others find the 5th movie boring.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07, edited on Jul 16, '07
zero-cinema? where do u live lady, geeze! hahaha kidding... the fight scenes were specatacular... and a friend said this is the only book/movie where Voldemort and Dumbledore duke it out, so that was awesome to behold... if u found the LOTR movies slow then i think you'll find the books even slower! haven't read 'em myself, buy a friend told me she read the books and found them extremely boring... plus they all bust out a song and dance number out of nowhere all the time daw, hahaha XD
genesisgreyz wrote on Jul 16, '07
zero-cinema?
hehehe... i am currently in Riyadh, I'd just wait for the DVD... hehe...i would really love to see Bella... (isnt she Charlie Bucket's mom in Charlie and the Chocolate factory?)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07, edited on Jul 16, '07
whoa, layo mo pala! yikes! as for bella being in charlie... yes she was mrs. bucket! helena bonham carter doesn't get as much screentime as i would've wanted here though... oh, and tonks is played by the chick in about a boy, natalia tena! see? great cast!
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
aftermath, u say of the 4 past hp movies..ü
i don't think so.ö if u have just read the book. 'whoa' der are a lot of scenes or super important details which weren't in the film.. it's disappointing 2 think.. BUT.. the special fx during dumbledore & voldemort's battle was awesome.ö

and bella was really overacting.(^^,)
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
Black is the caring father and cool uncle
sirius black, was james potter's best friend.. and when harry was born lily & james made sirius his godfather..üö
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
hey, thanks for droppin by! again trumped by a book reader! hahaha. well, by aftermath i meant the arc of the first four movies which was voldemort's return, which he finally did in the fourth. one thing about not reading the books is that i can judge the film alone with no bias, hence won't be disappointed when things are omitted! granted, when i eventually read the book, it won't have the same magic cuz' i already know the story and what's gunna happen. give or take! bella was supposed to be over-the-top i guess... she didn't have a lot of scenes though, so i guess you didn't have to bear with her overacting much!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07, edited on Jul 16, '07
yeah, i was referring to his paternal role to harry since his parents are deceased... i especially loved sirius' line at the climax to malfoy: "get your hands off my godson!" sabay sapak sa muka! great, great moment there!
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
yup!ü i ♥ dut scene too.. haha ü though it was merely in the book!
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
yes,bella had few scenes.. but what i'm pointing is.. how bellatrix lestrange there acted.ü as in, the way she laughs & giggles.. bella isn't like that, she's very silent actually.. and she just answers back or just surprisingly says something but not like that bella in the movie.. it was like she was insane, u know..(^^,)
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
yes,bella had few scenes.. but what i'm pointing is.. how bellatrix lestrange there acted.ü as in, the way she laughs & giggles.. bella isn't like that, she's very silent actually.. and she just answers back or just surprisingly says something but not like that bella in the movie.. it was like she was insane, u know..(^^,)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
oh really? i didn't know that! i guess only a book-reader like you could point that out... hmmm, maybe they changed her character in order to be a contrast to all the other villains like L.Malfoy? i dunno! hahaha. no wonder it came off as over-acting, her personality is different in the book pala...
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
yeah, actually it's one of those cheesy hollywood hero saves the day lines! but man, when gary oldman delivers, it suddenly has a ton of credibility! hahaha
genesisgreyz wrote on Jul 16, '07
haha!! parang andaming online sa page mo!!
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
oh really? i didn't know that! i guess only a book-reader like you could point that out... hmmm, maybe they changed her character in order to be a contrast to all the other villains like L.Malfoy? i dunno! hahaha. no wonder it came off as over-acting, her personality is different in the book pala...
yep yep.. anyhow, i'm a teeny-weeny happy 'bout that movie ndin..ü
and.. i am so lookin' forward to the next, know why? coz lucius wife would be there - bella's sister and of course, draco's mommy!ü ..narcisssa..ü
prettymarble wrote on Jul 16, '07
There's one big flaw in the story. and I'm quite surprised no one realizes it... HARRY had a hair cut, a neat hair cut.
u're right! harry's hair had always been messy.. NOT tidy.ü
darthstalker wrote on Jul 16, '07
hermione and ron along with draco dies in the deathly hallows book.
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07, edited on Jul 16, '07
i know! funny thing is, i never even planned to review the movie! i just did it on a whim the other day, a full 3 days after i watched (i usually write reviews the next day)... and now, it's got more replies in a day and a half than my transformers review for like, two weeks! there's actually twice as many replies than actual pageviews which i find funny. i guess makulit lang talaga mga tao kay harry potter or they're uber-potter-holics! kasama ka na rin dun! haha
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
WTF?!?!?! u better be kidding...
darthstalker wrote on Jul 16, '07
i shit you not, man. i shit you not.

/klingon cloaking device on
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
aw shit. i hate spoilers btw. well, it was eventually gunna come from somebody. u better put ur damn cloak on. put on harry's invisible cloak too. grrr....XD
jacquespal wrote on Jul 16, '07
Ryder, don't worry. I'm with you all the way! I don't even have anything to add. You said it all. Oh maybe one thing, i liked the fade-to-blacks. Especially the one where Hermione was laughing then end of scene. Reminded me of my favorite non-fantasy movie, Closer.
genesisgreyz wrote on Jul 16, '07
i guess makulit lang talaga mga tao kay harry potter or they're uber-potter-holics! kasama ka na rin dun! haha
oo nga.. i am a super potty geek tlg...

and im proud to be one (hahaha!!)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
hey jaques! it's ok, i welcome all opinions, whether it coincides with mine or not! wow, how nitty-gritty to notice the scene transitions! i'm betting you like observing details? haha. closer was a nice one... great cast... and when natalie portman is a stripper in a movie, it's a winner in my book. hahaha
sighs wrote on Jul 16, '07
i noticed it kuya acer, lol. and i didn't mind. :D
sighs wrote on Jul 16, '07
ReviewReviewReviewReviewReview
oh my gosh, i completely agree. with hermione acting like she was having an asthma attack and a toothache that is. ive also watched the movie twice, and have read all the books. i always come back to scholastic.com to see if the wizard challenge is back up, lol. cause it used to be my past time to see how far i can get, hehehe. im such a potter geek. :P
sighs wrote on Jul 16, '07
i wouldve hated it if radcliffe couldnt pull this one off. i mean, this is the teen angst, rebel phase you know? and for the past movies, im just not getting anything from him. maybe they threatened to replace him with a younger looking harry if he didnt get his act together, lol. and i can see why you would say dolores wins the who-to-hate-more contest. you haven't read the book, and you don't realize just how brilliant bellatrix lestrange's character has been portrayed. and yeah. i liked the occlumency lessons with snape. and as for james potter being a meanie, i think that scene has been truthful to the book, and i love it. kulang nga lang though. di nila pinakita si lily evans, who was yelling at james at how big his head is, and to put snape down and was then called a mudblood by snape. lol. that would have been so awesome! *singsong voice* the more you hate, the more you love!

i do agree that 869 pages cannot be fit in a 2 hour movie. kaya nga, i said movies and books are different eh. and they can be great the way they're supposed to be great. as a book. and as a movie. separately.
guerrillaradio wrote on Jul 16, '07
what's harry's mother's maiden name? hahahaha
Lily Evans, :P
gayette wrote on Jul 16, '07
yeah, i was referring to his paternal role to harry since his parents are deceased... i especially loved sirius' line at the climax to malfoy: "get your hands off my godson!" sabay sapak sa muka! great, great moment there!
Hey ryder... something else you "might" have missed... at the final scene...right before Sirius dies... he called Harry "James". You see... Sirius sees James in Harry...he often mistakes the father for the son. He's not really perfect-perfect as a godfather bec he sees Harry as a buddy at times... as Harry's dad, James.
gayette wrote on Jul 16, '07
what's harry's mother's maiden name? hahahaha
James Potter and Lily Evans got married...hence Lily Potter. :P

Sorry-- I missed this question. :) You've got a lot of replies here to wade thru
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
@ jay and gayette: mga addict!!!! hahaha. well, if i'm a toy and comic geek then you guys are my potter geeks. huhu!

@ gayette: i know! it's insane, i never expected so many replies! dami ko palang contacts na potter-fans, grabe!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07, edited on Jul 16, '07
hey, there's no shame in being a geek at anything! we all are at something anyway, so it's cool. glad you agree with most of my critique! i didn't find hermione that dreadful... but it seems a lot of you guys share that opinion! i don't think she did anything that distracting to the movie though, but that's just me.

as for being a potter geek myself... hmmm... maybe i'll wait for this to come out:
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
wow even more new characters! there's already so many! crap, no wonder all those spoilers about people dying are probably true... there's just too many characters!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
that's the spirit! XD
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 16, '07
yay, more people that agree with me! radcliffe has come a long way... this movie demanded the most out of him and he delivered! as for bellatrix, i really wanted more screentime for her even though i didn't know her role was bigger in the book! my reason was that if they gave the audience time to hate her, that would make sirius' 'death' more significant and moving. i didn't know that flashback scene with james also had harry's mommy! that would've been neat if the scene you described DID pan out! i'm glad they showed that harry's parents weren't the saints they were and gave a tragic depth to snape's character, showing no one is perfect or are who they seem on the outside.

thanks for droppin' by lyka! you potter geeks sure are speakin' out in this post. hahaha
darthstalker wrote on Jul 17, '07
there's an 8th book called j.k. rowling and the crock of gold it's a story about a destitute single mother who sold her soul to the devil.

(",)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 17, '07
... and the millions of people around the world who followed her into the inferno...XD
falinie wrote on Jul 17, '07
ang daming nagmamarunong dito... hehehehe!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 17, '07
bwahahaha oo nga eh! in fairness, marurunong naman talaga sila. hahaha
falinie wrote on Jul 17, '07
oo nga marurunong nga... pero alam mo yung feeling na parang "mas magaling pa sila kay J.K. Rowling"... yung ganun... sige na nga! magaling sa magaling! baka sila nga ang consultant at adviser ni J.K. Rowling habang sinusulat nya yang Harry Potter... ahehehehe!
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 17, '07
haha i guess when you grow fond of a character, you tend to have your own conception of what's right for them... like the transformers movie. everyone thought the new designs looked awful because they don't think it's right with what they're used to, but i think a majority of them liked it in the end (including myself).
darthstalker wrote on Jul 17, '07
ah basta, hindi ako LEMMING!

lollers.
acer3ya1 wrote on Jul 17, '07
fearless forecast :

- lupin and tonks will die...
- they'll need dobby's help in 7th
- malfoy will help harry beat voldemort (legilimens)
- ginny will join harry, ron, and hermione in search of the horcruxes
- ofcourse voldy will die.
- and lastly, harry potter is the last horcrux


hoo hah!!!
prettymarble wrote on Jul 17, '07
ReviewReviewReviewReviewReview
i thought so too that harry is a horcrux!ü
prettymarble wrote on Jul 17, '07
ReviewReviewReviewReviewReview
i thought so too that harry is a horcrux!ü
darthstalker wrote on Jul 17, '07, edited on Jul 17, '07
add to manong acer's forecast:

harry discovers he's a weasley.

after he sleeps with ginny.

dumbledore is alive.

as a bearded frog.

voldy will be stripped of his powers and sent to azkaban to have his salad tossed.
genesisgreyz wrote on Jul 18, '07, edited on Jul 18, '07
ei ryder,
finally saw the film..it wasnt boring at all (cuz why get bored? ive been all eyes and ears!) but yes... having read everything... i am quite unhappy...i've waited for it for so long and i didnt know they'd take out almost half of it... *sighs*